Login / Reg                    Nieuwsbrief  |   Agenda   |   Vacatures   |   Forum   |   Advies   |   Adverteer   |   Zoek
When is increasing flow effective?
Bron: Procesverbeteren.nl
TOC: Ongelimiteerde organisatie
More recently published articles in English are available on our sister website business-improvement.eu. Of course you can also find this article there.

Cover of 'Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica' (Newton)
Why increasing flow will work in every supply chain!
By Dr Jaap van Ede, editor-in-chief procesverbeteren.nl

What are the generic principles of different logistic improvement methods, like Lean manufacturing, the Theory of Constraints and Quick Response Manufacturing?

In “Standing on the shoulders of giants” Eliyahu Goldratt, founding father of the TOC, shows that all these methods are based on the same ideas. According to Goldratt, increasing flow and exposing rate-limiting steps will work in every supply chain, even if demand is unstable and/or if product life cycles are short!

What are the generic principles of different logistic improvement methods, like Lean manufacturing, the Theory of Constraints (TOC) and Quick Response Manufacturing (QRM)?

Same ideas
In Standing on the shoulders of giants1  Eliyahu Goldratt, founding father of the TOC, shows that all these methods are based on the same ideas. These principles were originally developed by Henry Ford2  (he is the first ‘giant’ in Goldratt's article):

  1. Improving flow* should be the primary objective to improve production chains (it is hereby assumed that there are several consecutive production steps)
    *or equivalently: reducing the lead time
  2. A control system should be in place to balance the flow, to reduce work-in-progress and to expose rate-limiting steps.
Ford, assemblagelijn (1913)
One of the earliest exampes of 'streaming' production, with just-in-time supply: The moving assembly line of Ford at the Highland Park Plant in 1913. Thanks to this and other innovations, the time it took to build a Model T dropped from 14 hours to 1.5 hours. (source: Ford, published with permission)

According to Goldratt, applying these principles will not only lead to improvement in the high volume / no variety environment of Ford (remember his motto “we make T-fords in all colors as long as it’s black”).
It will also work in another production environment, but then the control system should be adapted

In the table below, I freely summarized the ideas of Goldratt about how this should be done. I also added some new aspects. For example, Quick Response Manufacturing and CONWIP are not mentioned by Goldratt.

Flow-enhancing and work load controlling concepts1

period of

Production type

Focused improvement

Control concept

Trivial Name

Henry Ford

High volume,
no variety

1. Limit space between the workcenters

2. When space is full, (temporarily) stop production.

3. Improve workcenter directly after this position (because this is the current bottleneck)

Space reduction

In-line production

Taiichi Ohno

*) working during this period at Toyota

High volume,
medium variety and
stable* environment

*regarding producttype and demand and workload per workcenter

1. Limit inventory between the workcenters and in material supply chain

2. When maximum allowed inventory accumulates somewhere, stop production.

3.Improve workcenter directly after this position (because this is the current bottleneck)





Eli Goldratt

Rajan Suri 

and many others

Low volume,
high variety and/or
unstable* environment

*regarding producttype and/or demand and/or workload per workcenter

1. Limit time buffer for material and/or order release

2. Improve workcenters that have a queue of material waiting in front of them (these are the current bottleneck(s))

drum-buffer- rope

buffer management





1) Freely based on: "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants", E.M. Goldratt 
©  C.J. van Ede  &  procesverbeteren.nl   (2008-2013)

Taiichi Ohno (he is the second giant in Goldratt's article) adapted Ford’s production system for Toyota. In the environment Ohno faced, quite a lot of different car types had to be produced. To cope with that, Ohno first developed Kanban, to control the supply of the materials. Later, he added SMED to reduce set-up times, to make production in small batch quantities possible.

The production environment of Toyota is fairly stable. Car models change only once a year (or even less often), and the workload per work centre (the takt time) can be balanced. Even the demand is rather stable, at least until the economic crisis begun!

Jaap van Ede and Eliyahu Goldratt (on the right)

Not stable
What if your production environment is not stable, such as in low volume/high mix production, or when you have to deal with short product life cycles or a fluctuating demand? Then you should not reject the flow principle, but adapt Ohno’s system further, stresses Goldratt.

To do that he proposes a new control concept, based on lead time reduction.

In this approach, as a first step, materials are released with a time buffer which equals half the current lead time. This way, work-in-progress is dramatically reduced. Like with the control systems of Ford and Ohno, based on limited space and/or inventory, the "water level" on the shop floor drops so that the rocks (rate-limiting production steps) become visible and can be improved.

In addition a simple priority system is installed, which measures the time that passed since a production order was released. When true bottlenecks emerge, the theory of constraints (drum-buffer-rope) can be applied.

There are several alternatives for Goldratt’s approach, for example CONWIP or POLCA. If Goldratt’s article was ment to be a scientific review on logistic improvement methods, in my opinion he should have mentioned those alternatives.

However, the idea that it is always worthwhile to concentrate on increasing flow and exposing bottlenecks is very useful.

Historical roadmap  
Finally, one last remark about Goldratt’s article. He connects all major logistic improvement methods: Lean, TOC and QRM (note that he does this without mentioning the last one).

There are also methods which depart from improving productivity, like Total Productive Management, or quality, like Six Sigma. How do these methods fit in the historical roadmap of improvement methods? That question remains to be answered

Can you help us? If you succeed in extending the current roadmap (the table on this webpage) please let us know. Valuable contributions wil be published

1)On the shoulders of Giants of Eliyahu Goldratt was published on this site (full article) with his personal permission!
2) Ford's flow productie is not the only example demonstrating American roots of Lean, zie also Training Within Industry

Hulp nodig bij de implementatie van TOC?

Verwijzen naar dit artikel op internet?
Gebruik als link: https://www.procesverbeteren.nl/TOC/Goldratt_Shoulders_Giants_ENG.php

De Alignment PuzzelCimproKepner-Tregoe